State v. Bruner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is a well-defined difference between the offense of malicious or mischievous injury to property, and that of cru- elty to animals. The former constituted an indictable offense at common law, while the latter did not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1905-06-12· cited 19×
• Murray v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 15×
• State v. Nix
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-07· cited 11×
• McPherson v. James
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1896-12-19· cited 10×
• Adams Bros. v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1920-10-12· cited 8×
• Moore v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1914-12-11· cited 7×
• Holcomb v. Van Zylen
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1913-03-20· cited 5×
• State v. Giles
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1890-09-19· cited 3×
• Must Hatch Incubator Co. v. Patterson
  D. Oregon· 1928-05-14· cited 2×
• Martin v. State
  Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas· 1910-12-15· cited 1×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1909-03-24