Skip to main content

State v. Brownlow

Citations

  • 89 Wash. 582
  • 154 P. 1099
  • 1916 Wash. LEXIS 735

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law — Evidence—Confessions. A voluntary confession to a police officer is admissible, although accused was not reminded that she was under arrest and not obliged to reply and that her answer could be used against her.</p> <p>Witnesses — Privilege of Accused — Former Conviction. It is not an invasion of any constitutional right to ask, on cross-examination, whether the accused had ever suffered conviction before.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Appeal—Preservation of Grounds — Objections. Error cannot be predicated on a question to which no objection was-taken. • i •</p> <p>Criminal Law — Trial—Instructions—FOrmer Conviction. 'It is not error in charging the jury to mention that there was evidence of a former conviction, where the jury were told that it only affected the credibility oi the accused.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Appeal—Preservation of Grounds — Exceptions. Error cannot be predicated 'on instructions to which no exception was taken.</p>

Judges: Bausman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.