Skip to main content

State v. Browning

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1467

Syllabus

RECONSIDERATION – App.R. 26(A) pro se application delayed application permitted if the moving party can establish \extraordinary circumstances\ App.R. 14(B) Appellant filed his application slightly beyond the 10-day timeframe under App.R. 26(A)(1)(a) Appellant fails to establish \extraordinary circumstances\ in addition, we addressed in our decision Appellant's ineffective assistance of counsel and constitutional claims as well as his claim that the weight of the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and found no merit in any of his claims upon consideration of the App.R. 26(A) application, Appellant has not demonstrated any obvious errors or raised any issues that were not adequately addressed in our previous opinion this court is not persuaded that we erred as a matter of law application denied.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.