State v. Brouillard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that this Court will not review evidence that was not part of the hearing court’s record
• explaining that the “defendant’s impaired mental state, if it was impaired, was irrelevant to the question of the voluntariness of his confession because it was not induced by the police or by any other state actor”
• “This Court repeatedly has held that it will not consider a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel that is raised for the first time on a direct appeal.”
• \This Court repeatedly has held that it will not consider a claim of ineffectiveness of [trial] counsel that is raised for the first time on a direct appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).