Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/23/2013

State v. Brooks

Citations

838 N.W.2d 563
2013 WL 5731811
2013 Minn. LEXIS 426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the implied consent statute was complied with, but still analyzing the totality of the circumstances to determine whether consent was voluntarily procured
holding that chemical test under Minnesota Implied Consent Law is a search
stating that if someone refuses to comply with their previously implied consent, the police may not administer the test
stating that “the ability to consult with counsel about an issue supports the conclusion that a defendant made a voluntary decision”
stating that a defendant’s opportunity to consult counsel about an issue supports the conclusion that the defendant made a voluntary decision
stating that a defendant’s opportunity to consult counsel about an issue supports the conclusion that the defendant made a voluntary decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Gildea, Stras, Took, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.