State v. Brooks

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 1191

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences, Eighth Amendment rights, res judicata, nunc pro tunc. The appellant claims that the trial court erred in its consecutive sentencing and violating his Eighth Amendment rights are barred by res judicata because he could have argued both claims in his previous appeal to this court. This matter is remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of issuing a nunc pro tunc entry to reflect what actually occurred in open court.