Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/14/2011
State v. Brooks
Citations
- 2011 Ohio 5877
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The fundamental question of whether the trial court properly denied Brooks's petition for postconviction relief by finding him competent to be executed is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.\
- “The fundamental question of whether the trial court properly denied Brooks’s petition for postconviction relief by finding him competent to be executed is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,525×
- Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court· 2007-06-28· cited 1,422×
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1999-02-23· cited 698×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSupreme Court· 1998-05-18· cited 644×
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court· 1986-07-23· cited 260×
- Brooks v. BagleySixth Circuit· 2008-01-22· cited 55×
- State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court· 2001-05-11· cited 25×
- Bedford v. BobbySixth Circuit· 2011-05-18· cited 21×
- Jay D. Scott v. Betty MitchellSixth Circuit· 2001-05-30· cited 8×
- State v. YatesOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-29· cited 7×
- State v. LorraineOhio Supreme Court· 2011-03-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.