Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 4/5/1995
State v. Brooks
Citations
- 656 A.2d 1205
- 1995 Me. LEXIS 64
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a complaint gave the defendant sufficient notice because “the only logical reason” for alleging certain facts in the complaint would be to trigger the application of an enhanced sentencing provision
- stating that “a charging document cannot rely on a statutory reference alone to establish the offense or an element of the offense”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clifford, Collins, Dana, Glassman, Roberts, Rudman, Wathen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WarnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1967-12-26· cited 47×
- State v. SnowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-08-31· cited 22×
- State v. MyrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-10-26· cited 20×
- State v. HudsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-01-17· cited 18×
- State v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-04-07· cited 17×
- State v. ColemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-11-17· cited 14×
- State v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-05-30· cited 11×
- State v. HuntleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-03-06· cited 11×
- Landry v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-06-04· cited 7×
- State v. KeithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-07-26· cited 5×
- State v. ChattleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-12-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.