Skip to main content

State v. Brinkman

Citations

  • 239 N.E.3d 990
  • 2024 Ohio 1005

Syllabus

SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE IMPORTUNING CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES. The defendant-appellant's importuning conviction is based on sufficient evidence. The trial court made the appropriate findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.