Missouri Court of Appeals· 5/14/2012
State v. Brinkley
Citations
- 366 S.W.3d 104
- 2012 WL 1667605
- 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 648
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the conviction for sufficiency, “[w]e do not reweigh evidence or act as a ‘super juror’ with veto powers.”
- in reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the conviction for sufficiency, “[w]e do not reweigh evidence or act as a ‘super juror’ with veto powers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daniel E. Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ApplewhiteMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-05-23· cited 31×
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-11-08· cited 11×
- State v. CastoeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-01-27· cited 7×
- State v. MacLinMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 4×
- State v. NortonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-06-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.