State v. Bright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The determination of whether a defendant has the ability to pay child support in order to determine whether the failure to do so was intentional is a question of fact left to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-08-06· cited 101×
• State v. McCaslin
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-04-10· cited 67×
• People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur Likine
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2012-07-31· cited 62×
• State v. Franklin
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-09-25· cited 49×
• State v. Yelli
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1995-04-07· cited 48×
• State v. Erpelding
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-12-31· cited 31×
• State v. Schwartz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 13×
• State v. Waltrip
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Stephens
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-15· cited 52×
• State v. Bodtke
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-03-08· cited 37×
• State v. Nevels
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-04-06· cited 34×
• State v. Valdez
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 31×
• State v. Eichelberger
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1988-02-05· cited 20×
• State v. Brown
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-05-18· cited 13×
• State v. Zaritz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-06-15· cited 13×
• State v. Lohman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-08· cited 12×