State v. Briggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[t]he role of the legislature is to write the law\
• statute is clear on its face and whether it “is wise is not for [the courts] to decide” because the legislature “is the body to undertake such an endeavor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Logan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-11-13· cited 29×
• Logan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-05-03· cited 22×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-08-19· cited 15×
• Otterstatter v. City of Watertown
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2017-10-26· cited 7×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pharr
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-11-30· cited 257×
• United States v. Hugo Marin and Virgilio Orlando Romero
  Second Circuit· 1982-01-18· cited 135×
• State v. Lomagro
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-07-01· cited 82×
• State v. Giwosky
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-11-30· cited 40×
• Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1995-01-26· cited 27×