State v. Bridgett
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8480
Syllabus
Receiving stolen property R.C. 2913.51 Sufficiency Hearsay Sentence Nunc Pro Tunc. Although owner of car did not testify, sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction for receiving stolen property where car was reported stolen and officers testified that they \verified\ this report, steering column of vehicle was peeled, a shirt was wrapped around steering column, screwdrivers and a broken screwdriver were inside car, and defendant briefly struggled during his arrest.
Judges: Blackmon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court· 1978-09-27· cited 1,353×
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
- McDaniel v. BrownSupreme Court· 2010-01-11· cited 701×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri· 1980-03-11· cited 236×
- State v. BrewerOhio Supreme Court· 2009-02-18· cited 157×
- State ex rel. DeWine v. BurgeOhio Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 83×
- State v. RoseberryOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-17· cited 50×
- State v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court· 1982-12-22· cited 45×
- State v. ParraOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-11· cited 16×
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 2010-02-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.