State v. Bridges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant's need for rehabilitation is not a valid reason for an exceptional sentence as a matter of law
• the defendant’s need for rehabilitation is not a valid reason for an exceptional sentence as a matter of law
• in multiple offense case, an exceptional sentence that was less than the standard sentence for one conviction was too lenient and an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. TAI N.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-31· cited 22×
• State v. Crabtree
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-17· cited 6×
• State of Washington v. Salvador S. Nava
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-22

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Branch
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-01· cited 152×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 133×
• State v. Allert
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-08-01· cited 85×
• State v. Pennington
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-05-18· cited 44×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-04-02· cited 26×
• State v. Hortman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-12-30· cited 22×
• State v. Bridges
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-04· cited 7×
• State v. Hardesty
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-07-18· cited 6×
• State v. Fitch
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-07-11· cited 6×