State v. Bridge
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 166
Syllabus
Gambling, R.C. 3772.99, Dice Sliding, Other Acts Evidence. Sufficient evidence was presented to convict appellant of gambling in violation of R.C. 3772.99 by means of dice sliding. Appellant and his companions engaged in a deliberate effort to covertly remove the element of chance from the game of craps to their own wagering benefit and to the detriment of both the casino and the other gamblers at the table. Other acts evidence consisting of an attempt by appellant to slide dice at another casino was admissible to establish appellant's familiarity with the rules of craps and an absence of mistake in appellant's conduct.
Judges: Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 674×
- State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 418×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 417×
- State v. WhitsettOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-06· cited 110×
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-14· cited 10×
- State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 7×
- State v. MimsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-04· cited 6×
- Skipper v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1994-08-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.