Skip to main content

State v. Bridge

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 166

Syllabus

Gambling, R.C. 3772.99, Dice Sliding, Other Acts Evidence. Sufficient evidence was presented to convict appellant of gambling in violation of R.C. 3772.99 by means of dice sliding. Appellant and his companions engaged in a deliberate effort to covertly remove the element of chance from the game of craps to their own wagering benefit and to the detriment of both the casino and the other gamblers at the table. Other acts evidence consisting of an attempt by appellant to slide dice at another casino was admissible to establish appellant's familiarity with the rules of craps and an absence of mistake in appellant's conduct.

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.