State v. Breitbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding cautionary instruction negated prejudice where “the challenged testimony was rather brief in duration and promptly followed by an appropriate cautionary instruction”
• finding cautionary instruction was sufficient to mitigate prejudicial impact of inadmissible evidence where “the evidence was not extensive and the district court properly addressed the matter”
• noting limiting instructions may be used to combat potential prejudice from improper evidence
• noting limiting instructions may be used to combat potential prejudice from improper evidence
• noting limiting instructions may be used to combat potential prejudice from improper evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).