State v. Brea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the admissibility of hearsay statements of co-conspirators is merely a rule of evidence and is not dependent upon the existence of a count charging conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Plante v. DEPT. OF BUS. & PRO. REGULATION
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-13· cited 14×
• State v. Andres
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-07· cited 8×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• United States v. Martin H. Trowery, and Pernell E. Green, Jr
  Third Circuit· 1976-09-23· cited 76×
• United States v. Guillermo Gil
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-08-31· cited 40×
• Tresvant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-13· cited 28×
• Romani v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-04-27· cited 27×
• State v. Brea
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-08· cited 18×
• State v. Mena
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-11· cited 12×
• State v. Brea
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-29· cited 2×