Skip to main content

State v. Bratcher

Citations

  • 206 S.E.2d 408
  • 157 W. Va. 918
  • 1974 W. Va. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the trial court erred in refusing to provide a circumstantial evidence charge and citing with approval precedent relying on the traditional circumstantial evidence charge
  • evidence offered pertaining to separate and distinct offenses alleged to have been committed by the defendant must show involvement by the defendant in order to be admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Caplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.