Skip to main content

State v. Branham

Citations

  • 171 Conn. 12
  • 368 A.2d 63
  • 1976 Conn. LEXIS 1135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[i]n the absence of controlling statutory provisions the accused is not entitled to an instruction that no opinion prejudicial to him shall be drawn from his failure to testify’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “privilege [of a defendant] of refraining from testifying, if he so elect[s], does not protect him from any unfavorable inference which may be drawn by his triers from his exercise of the privilege” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House, Cotter, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Barber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.