State v. Brandon J. Clark
Syllabus
Brandon Jerome Clark appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor. He makes five arguments: the circuit court erred in (1) limiting his cross-examination of the person who conducted a recorded interview with the alleged victim, (2) admitting the recording of that interview into evidence, (3) excluding his expert on these sorts of recorded interviews, (4) denying a directed verdict, and (5) not finding a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). We affirm.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. KromahSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-01-23· cited 94×
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 84×
- State v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-02-04· cited 60×
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-08-09· cited 35×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-08-05· cited 28×
- State v. GathersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-06-06· cited 26×
Other cases named State v. Brandon J. Clark
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.