State v. Brandenburg
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5943
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by failing to hold a restitution hearing or by failing to award the victim restitution under Marsy's Law; the victim never requested restitution or a restitution hearing during the trial court proceedings, but instead conveyed its belief that restitution was not recoverable due to its having received an insurance payment for the economic loss sustained as a result of the criminal conduct. Appellant is prohibited from requesting restitution for the first time on appeal and, under the circumstances of this case, cannot demonstrate that the trial court's failure to award restitution amounted to plain error. Also, a restitution hearing was not necessary or required because appellant did not dispute the trial court's failure to award it restitution at the sentencing hearing. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 1,935×
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court· 2001-06-06· cited 807×
- State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court· 1968-04-17· cited 404×
- State v. McAlpinOhio Supreme Court· 2022-05-12· cited 139×
- State v. LalainOhio Supreme Court· 2013-07-17· cited 102×
- State v. YerkeyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-05· cited 42×
- State v. LeGrantOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-31· cited 35×
- State v. BrasherOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-28· cited 23×
- State v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-18· cited 11×
- State v. DonaldsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-27· cited 6×
- State v. LutherOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-06· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.