Skip to main content

State v. Brand

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 3321

Syllabus

NEW TRIAL – CRIM.R. 33(B): The common pleas court did not err by denying defendant's motion for leave to file a new-trial motion where he did not show that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the grounds upon which his new-trial motion depends: the former juror's affidavit did not describe the attendant circumstances in making the affidavit and the defendant's affidavit did not describe the circumstances attendant to securing the affidavit.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.