Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/24/2023

State v. Brady

Citations

2023 Ohio 1328

Syllabus

RELEVANT EVIDENCE. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by determining that certain evidence proferred by defendant-appellant was not relevant.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
In re Jane Doe 1
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-01-24· cited 969×
State v. Issa
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
State v. Conway
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
State v. Yarbrough
Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 560×
State v. Velez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-28· cited 50×
State v. Troche
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-27· cited 6×
State v. McDowell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-26· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.