State v. Brady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the trial court’s eliminating defendant’s second opportunity to talk with jurors prejudiced the defendant when the case had an issue of bias regarding racial overtones
• trial court erred by unreasonably limiting voir dire, precluding the parties from exploring bias
• court in certain circumstances may “reasonably reduc[e]” amount of time promised for questioning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Of Washington, Resp/cross-app V. Justin Dominic Bell, App/cross-resp
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-05-22· cited 17×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-08-31· cited 8×
• State v. Ford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-11· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-09-28· cited 186×
• State v. Frederiksen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-28· cited 41×