Montana Supreme Court· 2/26/2002
State v. Boyer
Citations
- 2002 MT 33
- 42 P.3d 771
- 308 Mont. 276
- 2002 Mont. LEXIS 47
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a game warden may request production of a valid hunting or fishing license when the circumstances reasonably indicate that an individual has been engaged in those activities”
- holding that \a game warden may request production of a valid hunting or fishing license when the circumstances reasonably indicate that an individual has been engaged in those activities\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jim Regnier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LovegrenMontana Supreme Court· 2002-07-09· cited 65×
- State v. HillMontana Supreme Court· 2004-07-13· cited 30×
- State v. EgdorfMontana Supreme Court· 2003-09-25· cited 25×
- State v. MoodyMontana Supreme Court· 2006-11-28· cited 24×
- Hagener v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 23×
- State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court· 2004-08-31· cited 22×
- People v. MaikhioCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 19×
- State v. LoganMontana Supreme Court· 2002-09-10· cited 19×
- State v. ColosimoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-09-25· cited 19×
- State v. T. StakerMontana Supreme Court· 2021-06-22· cited 18×
- Estate of Frazier v. MillerMontana Supreme Court· 2021-04-13· cited 16×
- State v. M. ZeimerMontana Supreme Court· 2022-05-24· cited 14×
- State v. MaileMontana Supreme Court· 2017-06-23· cited 13×
- Harris v. SmarttMontana Supreme Court· 2002-10-25· cited 12×
- Patterson v. State, Dept. of JusticeMontana Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 11×
- Pinkston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-31· cited 11×
- State v. Q. SmithMontana Supreme Court· 2021-12-28· cited 9×
- City of Whitefish v. LargeMontana Supreme Court· 2003-11-25· cited 8×
- Joseph Henry v. Dept of CorrectionsIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-01-23· cited 7×
- State v. McKeenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-08-11· cited 6×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-01-12· cited 680×
- Hulse v. State, Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court· 1998-05-05· cited 188×
- State v. BullockMontana Supreme Court· 1995-08-04· cited 147×
- State v. ElisonMontana Supreme Court· 2000-11-16· cited 122×
- Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 1999-10-26· cited 120×
- State v. LohMontana Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 99×
- United States v. WeinrichFifth Circuit· 1978-12-15· cited 99×
- State v. SiegalMontana Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 97×
- Frank J. Prochaska, Cross-Appellee v. Francis H. Marcoux, Cross-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1980-11-10· cited 96×
- State v. SawyerMontana Supreme Court· 1977-10-18· cited 73×
- State v. ReesmanMontana Supreme Court· 2000-09-11· cited 66×
- State v. ReynoldsMontana Supreme Court· 1995-07-17· cited 65×
- State v. ScheetzMontana Supreme Court· 1997-12-05· cited 65×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-02-14· cited 62×
- United States v. Gerald Randall Whitaker and Edward Joseph FitzpatrickFifth Circuit· 1979-04-04· cited 58×
- Robert D. Blair v. United States of America, Charles L. Moore v. United States of America, William G. Dodds, Jr. v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1981-11-30· cited 57×
- Bozeman Daily Chronicle v. City of Bozeman Police DepartmentMontana Supreme Court· 1993-08-27· cited 51×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.