State v. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Filing the complaint tolls the running of the statute of limitations.”
• “We, therefore, believe it is abundantly clear that felony criminal proceedings commence with either the filing of a complaint or by indictment.”
• expiration of statute of limitation does not terminate court's subject matter jurisdiction
• expiration of statute of limitation does not terminate court’s subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-28· cited 38×
• People v. Burns
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-06-26· cited 35×
• State v. Leonard
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2005-06-22· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Oliver
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2008-05-22· cited 5×
• State v. Tidwell
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 4×
• State v. Bingman
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-10-29· cited 3×
• State v. Padilla
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-03-31· cited 2×
• State of Arizona v. John William Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-28
• State of West Virginia v. Joseph Caldwell
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2015-05-18
• Robert Lee Lewis v. Donnie Ames, Superintendent
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2019-11-21

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Timoteo
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1997-10-14· cited 57×
• Weber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-02· cited 24×
• State Ex Rel. Rowe v. Ferguson
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-07-08· cited 20×
• State v. King
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1954-10-26· cited 19×
• State v. Bruffey
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-05-05· cited 18×
• State v. Bowers
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-20· cited 16×