State v. Boyce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a limitation on the right to bear arms is permissible when the means chosen to protect the public \do[es] not unreasonably interfere with the right\
• holding that a limitation on the right to bear arms is permissible when the means chosen to protect the public \do[es] not unreasonably interfere with the right\
• regulation requiring people on a public street or in a public place to remove ammunition from their firearms is constitutional because it only regulates manner and does not unreasonably hinder right to bear arms
• regulation requiring people on a public street or in a public place to remove ammunition from their firearms is constitutional because it only regulates manner and does not unreasonably hinder right to bear arms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-05-22· cited 16×
• Oregon State Shooting Ass'n v. Multnomah County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-25· cited 7×
• State v. Owenby
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 5×
• State v. Smoot
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-06-14· cited 4×
• State v. Christian
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-21· cited 4×
• State v. Warden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-06· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kessler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-07-15· cited 87×
• State v. Blocker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-06-30· cited 68×
• CHRISTIAN v. La Forge
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1952-04-02· cited 25×