State v. Bowling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that revocation of a contractor's license was a civil sanction, not a criminal punishment, and did not bar criminal prosecution for fraud in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause
• holding that under the analysis in Hudson, revocation of contractor’s license was a civil sanction and did not bar a criminal prosecution for fraud in violation of double jeopardy
• upholding grand theft prosecution of construction contractor who claimed that $5,000 civil fine and revocation of state license by Construction Industry Licensing Board for incident created double jeopardy bar to criminal prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lescher v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-03· cited 10×
• Locklear v. FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-12· cited 5×
• Laws v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Halper
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
• Hudson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
• United States v. Ward
  Supreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 969×
• Borrego v. Agency for Health Care Admin.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-18· cited 9×