State v. Bowers
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3207
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – SENTENCING: Where the jury found defendant guilty of raping a child in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) with the additional finding that the child was less than ten years of age, the trial court erred in sentencing defendant under R.C. 2971.03(B)(1)(c) for a forcible rape of a child where the state did not include a specification in the indictment that defendant purposefully compelled the victim to submit by force or threat of force: the trial court erred in imposing a sentence that relied on a fact that was not included in the indictment and found by the jury by proof beyond a reasonable doubt. [See CONCURRENCE: Defendant's Sixth Amendment rights were violated where the statutory minimum sentence was increased without any factual finding by the jury.]
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 1,506×
- United States v. HaymondSupreme Court· 2019-06-26· cited 398×
- State v. MasonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-27· cited 16×
- State v. StatzerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-24· cited 12×
- State v. BowersOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-09· cited 10×
- Episcopal School v. LevinOhio Supreme Court· 2008-03-12· cited 10×
- Washington Mut. Bank v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.