Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 5/7/1990
State v. Bowers
Citations
- 392 S.E.2d 482
- 301 S.C. 457
- 1990 S.C. App. LEXIS 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting defendant could have objected to specific testimony and requested a limiting instruction in order to protect himself from claimed prejudice in trial judge’s refusal to grant his motion for severance
- A party cannot use Rule 59(e) to present to the court an issue the party could have raised prior to judgment but did not.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Gardner, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-11-14· cited 79×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-07· cited 41×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 37×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-08-18· cited 33×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-11-03· cited 30×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-08-15· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.