Skip to main content
· 6/7/2023

State v. Boware

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1874

Syllabus

gross sexual imposition – probation – motion for new trial – res judicata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that consequences that might foreclose application of the doctrine on direct appeal may not suffice to prevent its application on collateral review
  • holding that consequences that might foreclose application of the doctrine on direct appeal may not suffice to prevent its application on collateral review
  • concurrent sentence doctrine is a “species of harmless-error analysis” that “conserve[s] judicial resources by permitting courts to avoid adjudicating issues when a favorable ruling could not affect prison time or alleviate some other harm” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.