· 6/7/2023
State v. Boware
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1874
Syllabus
gross sexual imposition – probation – motion for new trial – res judicata
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that consequences that might foreclose application of the doctrine on direct appeal may not suffice to prevent its application on collateral review
- holding that consequences that might foreclose application of the doctrine on direct appeal may not suffice to prevent its application on collateral review
- concurrent sentence doctrine is a “species of harmless-error analysis” that “conserve[s] judicial resources by permitting courts to avoid adjudicating issues when a favorable ruling could not affect prison time or alleviate some other harm” (citation modified)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.