State v. Bortz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that courts will not grant post-petition relief based upon matters raised subsequent to the underlying petition
• noting that a petition for review must set forth specific claims, present sufficient argument supported by legal authority and include citation to the record.
• noting that incorporation by reference is inadequate to satisfy the requirements of Rule 32.9(a)
• applying waiver to claims that could “have been previously raised” in a petition for post-conviction relief but were not 3 STATE v. MAYO Decision of the Court preserved
• denying relief upon review of the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief where petitioner failed to meet the “heavy burden in showing the court why the non-compliance [with the timelines set forth in Rule 32.9] should be excused”
• denying relief upon review of the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief where petitioner failed to meet the “heavy burden in showing the court why the non-compliance [with the timelines set forth in Rule 32.9] should be excused”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).