District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/20/1985
State v. Borges
Citations
- 467 So. 2d 375
- 10 Fla. L. Weekly 779
- 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13064
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding eight-and-one-half-month delay not presumptively prejudicial
- finding an eight-and-a-half-month delay is not presumptively prejudicial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boardman, Edward, Lehan, Ret, Schoonover
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 2,170×
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court· 1982-03-31· cited 917×
- Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 322×
- Rabinovitch v. NyquistSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 131×
- Howell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-31· cited 33×
- State Ex Rel. Wright v. YawnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-09-10· cited 23×
- State v. BonamyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-10· cited 21×
- Sumbry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-04· cited 19×
- State v. FraserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-15· cited 15×
- Mulryan v. JUDGE, DIV.\ C\ CIR. CT.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-08-31· cited 10×
- Marrero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-09· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.