State v. Booth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ “we are not disposed to treat the illegitimate child so differently from the legitimate child caught in the backwash of his parents’ separation. In all sense of justice and equity, any such distinction, at least as to the right of parental support, belongs to a bygone da/ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wood
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-09-29· cited 74×
• In Re Parentage of JMK
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-09-15· cited 51×
• Brock v. Kepl
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-09-15· cited 48×
• Linda D. v. Fritz C.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-23· cited 13×
• In re the Welfare of Feldman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-09-24· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gomez v. Perez
  Supreme Court· 1973-01-17· cited 466×
• State v. Russell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-06-09· cited 59×
• Armijo v. Wesselius
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-05-02· cited 47×
• Estate of Woodward
  California Court of Appeal· 1964-10-09· cited 30×
• Kaur v. Chawla
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-06-03· cited 25×
• Aquarian Foundation v. KTVW, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-06-24· cited 24×
• Lizotte v. Lizotte
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-06-14· cited 16×
• State v. Coffey
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-02-19· cited 13×
• Riley v. Sturdevant
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-03-03· cited 12×