State v. Booher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Booher’s claims regarding both in personam and subject matter jurisdiction on grounds nearly identical to those presented by defendant
• rejecting argument that an automobile is not a “motor vehicle” and concluding that “appellant’s 1985 Dodge Daytona is a motor vehicle”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).