State v. Boobar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that 42 U.S.C. § 290dd-2 does not operate as a rule of evidentiary privilege or exclusion; instead it provides for a fine in the event of a violation
• affirming exclusion of evidence, offered in a murder case, that another individual believed he had been investigated by the Department of Human Services for alleged improper sexual contact with the victim
• “The court must take into account the extent to which the alternative perpetrator evidence is in dispute, the time required to present it, and the extent of rebuttal evidence that it would generate, i.e., the extent that it would result in a trial within a trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).