State v. Bonilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]hether [a] third party had actual authority [to consent to a search] involves a resolution of factual issues” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bonilla
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-31· cited 39×
• State v. H. K. D. S. (A163158)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-01· cited 8×
• State v. J. D. H. (In re J. D. H.)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-10· cited 3×
• State v. Pichardo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-02· cited 2×
• State v. Stevens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
• United States v. Vernon Snype, Marisa Hicks
  Second Circuit· 2006-03-17· cited 242×
• State v. Unger
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 113×
• United States v. Zoila Melgar
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-09-19· cited 106×
• United States v. Damen Anthony Davis
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-06-11· cited 80×
• State v. Carsey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 59×
• State v. Ready
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-05-28· cited 46×
• State v. Lynch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-11-23· cited 21×
• State v. Lorenzo
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 20×
• State v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-17· cited 17×
• State v. KUROKAWA-LASCIAK
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-25· cited 12×
• State v. Edgell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-03-18· cited 9×
• State v. Doyle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 8×
• State v. Surface
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-08-14· cited 7×