Skip to main content

State v. Bolling

Citations

  • 75 S.W.3d 418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We disagree with the [S]tate’s premise that the enhancement and mitigating factors are irrelevant when the sole issue before the court is the manner of service of a felony sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Witt, Tipton, Wedemeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.