Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/29/1985
State v. Boldt
Citations
- 700 P.2d 1186
- 40 Wash. App. 798
- 1985 Wash. App. LEXIS 2427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- question of whether or not police officer used excessive force in effecting arrest is for the trier of fact
- “The purpose of the rule is to ensure that, once an individual is charged with a crime, he or she is fairly treated.”
- question of whether or not police officer used excessive force in effecting arrest is for the trier of fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SteinWashington Supreme Court· 2001-07-12· cited 156×
- Staats v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2000-01-06· cited 77×
- State v. LampmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-29· cited 22×
- State v. StephansCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-05· cited 18×
- State v. KnapstadCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-09-16· cited 13×
- State v. MichielliCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-23· cited 2×
- Staats v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2000-01-24
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RandeckerWashington Supreme Court· 1971-08-19· cited 108×
- State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court· 1976-05-27· cited 101×
- State v. StarrishWashington Supreme Court· 1975-12-11· cited 74×
- State v. WestlundCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-05-09· cited 42×
- State v. WhitneyWashington Supreme Court· 1981-12-17· cited 42×
- State v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-02-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.