State v. Boldman
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3572
Syllabus
Appellant's sentence is not contrary to law where the trial court properly considered sentencing factors in R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12 in imposing the sentences, which were all within the applicable sentencing ranges. The trial court did not violate appellant's right to appeal, right to trial by jury, right to due process, or the separation of powers in imposing an indefinite sentence pursuant to the Reagan Tokes Law. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-09-23· cited 582×
- State v. DorseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-15· cited 137×
- State v. LeopardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 113×
- State v. LeammanOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-17· cited 8×
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-14· cited 5×
- State v. DennisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.