· 4/12/2011
State v. Bolding
Citations
- 253 P.3d 279
- 227 Ariz. 82
- 606 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 31
- 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 48
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding A.R.S. § 13-4033(C) can only be applied constitutionally if a defendant is informed of the consequences of delaying sentencing
- explaining that Section 13-4033(A) codifies the state constitutional right of a criminal defendant to appeal and specifies what orders are appealable
- waiver of right to appeal pursuant to § 13-4033(C) requires the defendant “has been informed he could forfeit the right to appeal” by absconding
- When a defendant has voluntarily delayed sentencing by more than 90 days, this court is without jurisdiction to decide conviction issues raised on the direct appeal.
- “A judgment of conviction is final only when a verdict has been rendered, whether by jury or the trial court after a bench trial, and sentence has been ‘orally pronounced in open court and entered on the clerk’s minutes.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Espinosa, Brammer, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.