State v. Bolan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that practical difficulties in securing transportation and finding and hiring experts for blood testing and analysis do not present due process violation
• practical difficulties of securing transportation or obtaining medical personnel do not violate due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Tucson v. Grezaffi
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-05-15· cited 14×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-07-30· cited 11×
• State v. Soltero
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-07-03· cited 8×
• Van Herreweghe v. Burke
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-12-11· cited 8×
• State v. Esser
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-23· cited 5×
• State v. Storholm
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-03-24· cited 4×
• State of Arizona v. John Robert Esser
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• California v. Trombetta
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
• Baca v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 68×
• Montano v. Superior Court Pima County
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-10· cited 60×
• Oshrin v. Coulter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-10-02· cited 39×
• Crouch v. Justice of the Peace Court of the Sixth Precinct
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-05-20· cited 38×
• State v. Velasco
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-09-19· cited 33×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-12-10· cited 32×
• Moss v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-29· cited 12×