Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
West Virginia Supreme Court· 12/8/1998

State v. Boggess

Citations

  • 512 S.E.2d 189
  • 204 W. Va. 267
  • 1998 W. Va. LEXIS 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Consequently, it is apparent that the trial court made the right ruling for the wrong reason.... Hence, even though, contrary to the trial court's reasoning, ... the evidence still was properly excluded.”
  • “Consequently, it is apparent that the trial court made the right ruling for the wrong reason. . . . Hence, even though, contrary to the trial court’s reasoning, . . . the evidence still was properly excluded”
  • “Consequently, it is apparent that the trial court made the right ruling for the wrong reason . . . . Hence, even though, contrary to the trial court’s reasoning, . . . the evidence still was properly excluded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGRAW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.