State v. Blurton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the “orders of another” jury charge is a correct proposition of law
• “Instructions that do not fit the facts of the case may serve only to confuse the jury.”
• \Only law applicable to the case should be charged to the jury. Instructions that do not fit the facts of the case may serve only to confuse the jury.\
• \Only law applicable to the case should be charged to the jury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McKnight v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 43×
• State v. Lee-Grigg
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-16· cited 22×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-02-25· cited 15×
• State v. Holland
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-08-18· cited 8×
• State v. Commander
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-11· cited 6×
• State v. Childers
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-04-12· cited 2×
• State v. Wharton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-10· cited 1×
• State v. Bowers
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
• Ralph v. McLaughlin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
• State v. Wharton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-07-05
• State v. Devin J. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-11-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jefferies
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-05· cited 45×
• State v. Leonard
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-13· cited 42×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-26· cited 36×
• State v. Blurton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-08-07· cited 1×