Skip to main content

State v. Blocker

Citations

  • 505 P.2d 1099
  • 211 Kan. 185
  • 1973 Kan. LEXIS 372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after verdict has been returned it is not improper for an interested attorney to interview members of jury so long as the limitations of applicable rule are observed
  • trial court did not err by refusing to instruct the jury as to the turbulent character of the deceased and his predisposition to violence
  • party may introduce competent evidence to prove a fact even if that evidence tends to impeach or contradict party's previous witness
  • K.S.A. 60-444 “not intended to authorize broad hunting expeditions or fishing excursions.”
  • K.S.A. 60-444 \not intended to authorize broad hunting expeditions or fishing excursions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fontron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.