State v. Blaylock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The standard of review applicable to a motion to suppress requires an appellate court to defer to the trial court’s factual findings but review legal conclusions de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bethel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-05· cited 6×
• State v. E.W.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-29· cited 4×
• Alfredo Arturo Sotelo Gomez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-19· cited 3×
• State v. C.J.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-31· cited 2×
• State v. Randolph Hutz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Popple v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
• Curtis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-12· cited 40×
• State v. Abbey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-24· cited 13×
• League v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07· cited 12×
• State v. Hafer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-13· cited 4×