Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/22/1978
State v. Blassingame
Citations
- 244 S.E.2d 528
- 271 S.C. 44
- 1978 S.C. LEXIS 460
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding when a jury submits a question to the court following a jury charge, it is reasonable to assume the jury is focusing “critical attention” on the specific question asked
- finding that when a jury submits a question to the court following a jury charge, it is reasonable to assume the jury is focusing \critical attention\ on the specific question asked, and that the information relayed by the trial judge to the jury is given \special consideration.\
- finding when a jury submits a question to the court following a jury charge, it is reasonable to assume the jury is focusing \critical attention\ on the specific question asked
- noting when a jury submits a question to the trial court following a jury charge, \[i]t is reasonable to assume\ the jury is \focus[ing] critical attention\ on the specific question asked and the information relayed by the trial court to the jury is given \special consideration\
- intent is an element of voluntary manslaughter
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rhodes, Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-11-03· cited 58×
- State v. MarinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-03-23· cited 30×
- State v. CreechCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-31· cited 27×
- State v. GambleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-08-28· cited 23×
- High v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 22×
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-06-10· cited 11×
- State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-07-15· cited 9×
- Rutland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-03-30· cited 8×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-06-03· cited 6×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-02· cited 2×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-07-17
- State v. John Ernest Perry, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-07-26
- The Estate of Jane Doe 202 v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-09-29
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.