Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/31/2022
State v. Blankenship
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1808
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by revoking defendant-appellant's community control. The trial court made the required findings regarding the imposition of consecutive sentences. However, those findings were not incorporated into the sentencing entry. Judgment affirmed and cause remanded with instructions.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. RaberOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-05· cited 119×
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 1975-04-16· cited 116×
- State v. DelaneyOhio Supreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 80×
- State v. NienbergOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-22· cited 63×
- State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-29· cited 24×
- State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 18×
- State v. PattonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-07· cited 15×
- State v. NewsomeOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-31· cited 13×
- State v. KnerrOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-15· cited 11×
- State v. KaimachiandeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-20· cited 7×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-09· cited 6×
- State v. ZegerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-11· cited 4×
- In re Z.M.WOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.