State v. Bland
Citations
- 91 Kan. 160
- 136 P. 947
- 1913 Kan. LEXIS 354
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. District Court — Sitting in Two Places in Same County — Form of Criminal Information. A statute provides that the district court of Cherokee county shall be held in two places, and prescribes that actions commenced in that court shall be entitled as sitting at one or the other of the places. An information filed at one of the places, and to which the defendants were recognized'to appear,'was entitled “State of Kansas, ■ County of Cherokee, ss: In the District Court of said County • and State,” followed by the names of the parties, but did not , name the place in which the information was filed and the case was tried. Held, that the omission of the name of the place in the county did not invalidate the information, nor operate to' the prejudice of the defendants.'</p> <p>2. Misdemeanor — Voluntary Absence of Defendant from. Trial— Conviction Valid. A defendant at liberty on a bond can not, by voluntarily leaving the court room during a part of the trial, nullify the proceedings had, nor impair the validity of a verdict rendered against him in his absence.</p> <p>3. Fees — Attorney-general—Liquor Cases — Denial—Appeal. An appeal may be taken by the state from a decision refusing to allow fees to the attorney-general for convictions obtained by him in prosecutions for violations of the prohibitory liquor law.</p> <p>4. Prosecutions — Under Prohibitory Law — Attorney-general Entitled to Fees.. The statute providing for the allowance of such fees is not repugnant to that part of section 15 of article 1 of the state constitution which provides that certain state officers shall receive compensation for their services at stated times.</p> <p>5. - Same — Joint Defendants — Fees Chargeable to Each ■ Defendant on Each Count. Where several defendants are jointly tried and convicted of offenses charged in a number of counts in a single information the prosecuting attorney is entitled to the allowance of the fee provided in section 4377 of the
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he ordinary meaning of the term ‘compensation’ as applied to public officers is remuneration in whatever form it may be given, whether it be salaries or fees, or both combined.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Galindo v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-12-09· cited 59×
- State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1940-05-04· cited 30×
- State v. GlazeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1968-01-27· cited 23×
- State v. Marshall & Brown-Sidorowicz, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-04-14· cited 20×
- International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local No. 64 v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 17×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-11-03· cited 17×
- Sturgeon v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-10-10· cited 16×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-07-10· cited 16×
- State v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1915-11-06· cited 15×
- State v. MarekSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-02-08· cited 15×
- State v. FrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-10-11· cited 12×
- Cox v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas· 1959-12-12· cited 9×
- Kenreck v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-01-21· cited 8×
- State v. ShortSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-06-12· cited 6×
- Secretary of State v. Indiana State AFL-CIOIndiana Court of Appeals· 1978-01-30· cited 1×
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2010-02-11
- Opinion No. 73-116 (1973) AgOklahoma Attorney General Reports· 1973-05-09
- Dawson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-12-09
- Robinson v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-12-26
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-12-07· cited 39×
- State v. WallerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-11-08· cited 37×
- In re EllisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-07-05· cited 9×
- Nation v. TulleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-02-10· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Atchison v. DawsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-11-08· cited 8×
- Hastie v. BurrageSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-06-11· cited 7×
- Bailey v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-02-11· cited 7×
- State v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-03-07· cited 7×
- State v. KinnemanIndiana Supreme Court· 1872-05-15· cited 3×
- State v. ForneySupreme Court of Kansas· 1884-01-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.