Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/8/2003
State v. Blalock
Citations
- 591 S.E.2d 632
- 357 S.C. 74
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a witness had not unequivocally admitted the prior inconsistent statement simply by virtue of recognizing some details were lacking in the prior statement
- finding a prior inconsistent statement admissible when the witness conceded multiple times she made the statement, but \she [was] simultaneously eager to explain and amend her words and intent\
- \Our courts have consistently held that a trial court's decision to admit evidence of a witness's prior inconsistent statement will not be reversed absent a manifest abuse of discretion.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kittredge, Stilwell, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-24· cited 90×
- McKissick v. J.F. Cleckley & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 63×
- State v. LynnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-12-02· cited 46×
- State v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-09· cited 21×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-08-08· cited 14×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1895-02-20· cited 13×
- State v. BottomsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-02-28· cited 11×
- State v. SierraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-04· cited 11×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-04-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.